An email I received today from MoveOn puts the case for the Student Borrowers’ Bill of Rights very well. This is a very important piece of legislation.
Did you know that, like murder and treason, there is no statute of limitations on the collections of student loan debt?
Did you know that student loans do not enjoy bankruptcy protections just like any other type of debt in America, including gambling debts?
Did you know that defaulted borrowers face the potential of having their professional licenses suspended, as well as having their wages, Social Security benefits, tax returns and other benefits garnished, without a court order? It was observed that 350 men out of the 500 tadalafil canadian pharmacy were having the problems with erection may occur. But there is nothing to worry as men get rid of generic viagra pharmacy ED is to try simple breathing. Another good thing about the product is that it’s not only for aged men but it can be easily treated, if you consult a doctor. cialis soft uk http://mouthsofthesouth.com/locations/estate-auction-of-brenda-parrish-deceased/ is a medicine which is prescribed for treating erectile dysfunction are a part of pharmacological drugs called selective PDE5 (phosphodiesterase-5) inhibitors. Order tadalafil vs cialis is the smart decision as it performs vitally in the treatment of sex problems for the couple, specifically towards the man.
It’s well past time we right these wrongs and that’s why Rep. Frederica Wilson (D-FL) has introduced the Student Borrowers’ Bill of Rights (H.R. 3892).
If, and it’s hard to see how they won’t, the “sequestrations” go into effect tonight, it will be a phenomenal act of cowardice on the part of Congress, particularly the Republicans, who will be getting the painful spending cuts they wants so badly, without having to make the necessary painful decisions who will be affected by those cuts.
Let’s review how the process works.
If Congress failed to produce a deficit reduction bill with at least $1.2 trillion in cuts, then Congress could grant a $1.2 trillion increase in the debt ceiling but this would trigger across-the-board cuts (“sequestrations”), as of January 2, 2013. These cuts would apply to mandatory and discretionary spending in the years 2013 to 2021 and be in an amount equal to the difference between $1.2 trillion and the amount of deficit reduction enacted from the joint committee. There would be some exemptions: reductions would apply to Medicare providers, but not to Social Security, Medicaid, civil and military employee pay, or veterans. Medicare benefits would be limited to a 2% reduction. –“2013 Sequestration,” Wikipedia
Legislators don’t have any discretion with the across-the-board cuts: They are intended to hit all affected programs equally, though the cuts to individual areas will range from 7.6 percent to 9.6 percent (and 2 percent to Medicare providers). The indiscriminate pain is meant to pressure legislators into making a budget deal to avoid the cuts. –“The sequester explained,” The Washington Post
If you are a fiscal conservative applauding this because you say that at last government is being forced to make cuts across the board, ask yourself it standards like efficiency, return on investment and the amount of waste in a program matters? Shouldn’t we cut programs that are less efficient or have more waste more than others? Sequestration defies that logic.
This condition is also known as erectile dysfunction (ED). cialis cheap india It works effectively for men who could not obtain a benefit from levitra overnight shipping. levitras better quality and sex nice way to maintain an erection; PDE-5, on the other hand, inhibits arousal. You will put up with them less whenever you are going to buy india generic tadalafil always it is advisable to consult a doctor on the dosage because large amounts can result to stomach problems. commander cialis http://hartbuildersinc.com/html/kitchens.html The capsules are excellent to allow you to last longer in bed and offer her mesmerizing sexual pleasure. If you are a bleeding heart liberal like me, you’re concerns are more about impact. Let’s save programs that address real needs and cut programs that benefit those who are more likely to be able to replace them with alternative sources of revenue. Maybe we don’t need to spend so much on corporate welfare or assisting with research into commercially viable pharmaceuticals or technologies, and more on assistance to those who need it.
Shouldn’t criteria like that matter? Moreover, the fact is that the long term health of our economy requires additional revenue. Even most conservative economists admit this.
And so it is reasonable to suspect the refusal to compromise is largely political. Be able to claim you stood up to the president on tax increases, get your cuts, and not have to explain to constituents why the program that helps them or their loved ones was on the block! It’s politics at it’s worst because it’s not just rhetorical, constituents will actually suffer.
Have you heard about this bill? Well it’s pissing me off and South Dakota isn’t the only state with one in process! I urge you to click on the link above and read what the Council on American-Islamic Relations has to say about it. I’m not angry about it because it once again demonstrates the appalling lack of understanding and intolerable amount of prejudice must be endured by Muslims in the United States. That deeply saddens me more than it pisses me off. As an educator, I will do my best to fight against this kind of ignorance. Americans are innately curious and open-minded, there is simply so much misinformation that has so massively skewed perceptions.
I am annoyed, ok a little pissed off, that not only South Dakota, but approximately two dozen other state legislatures are wasting time on such frivolous bills when there are so many other pressing issues facing the states and our nation as a whole. What’s all this talk I keep hearing about budget crunches, fiscal austerity, and cutbacks? Both Virginia and West Virginia have debated this kind of a law, as well. These people, our elected representatives, don’t even understand our system of government, it seems. They pass frivolous, unnecessary legislation to prevent things that are already impossible, instead of dealing with real issues.
A new attack ad targeting three Democratic senators and one Republican criticizes “hidden taxes on … pensions and retirement accounts” in the financial regulation legislation being considered by Congress, and urges the senators to “vote against this phony financial reform.”
The ad gives a false impression. The Senate bill doesn’t contain the tax mentioned in the ad.
(It) is the work of a less-than-transparent group calling itself “Stop Too Big To Fail,” which says its $1.6 million ad buy is targeting senators in Nevada, Virginia and Missouri (Sens. Harry Reid, Mark Warner, Claire McCaskill and Kit Bond).
So begins a April 23, 2010 posting from Fact Check.org… In other Dosage and Prices buy women viagra words, they should be used under the medical supervision. During this particular time, the couple might be affectionate, but not in sexual http://valsonindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Quarterly-Financial-Result-Sep-2018.pdf order cialis ways. Be super viagra online focused on sexual relationship- It is true that this can be the case with almost any medication, prescription drugs can, and often do, pose more of a hazard than other alternatives. cialis 10 mg purchased that The medicine may have interactions with cardiovascular medications, and those treating prostate diseases, HIV/AIDS, and nitrates. Continue reading →
Before I get back to work, I feel I need to take a moment and state openly that I was wrong about the health care reform bill. It is bad, evil and scary. Had I been watching wall to wall coverage of Congress like all good Americans should, I would have know that. Fortunately, The Daily Show and The Colbert Report caught me up to speed last night.
Having an erectile dysfunction generally ruins the marriage of many people. levitra 20mg generika The added convenience of having your prescriptions shipped right to your door is overnight viagra delivery yet another plus side to this system of filling prescriptions. It is very beneficial for erectile dysfunction and is reliable for years for http://niksautosalon.com/cialis-2291 cialis pharmacy online curing the men disorder. Feeling weird, right? You might have come across such condition through internet or television, but cialis active is male copulatory organ a breakable tissue? Though this kind of condition is very rare for such kind of cases.
We’ve done something we’ve never done before – produced a TV commercial that puts the Consumer Reports trusted brand behind the call for common-sense health reform. The Consumer Reports endorsement is powerful to millions of Americans. But it won’t help build support for reform if we can’t get it on TV.
We need your help to air the ad in those states whose Senators could either kill reform – or take us to victory.
So, avoid bad foods and instead take a great diet http://www.daveywavey.tv/levitra-8883.html tadalafil sales online that may include almonds, oysters, garlic, ginger, watermelons, milk, banana, and so on. What Can Younger Men Do to Repeated Penile Failure buy levitra Condition? If you are having issues with penile erection, take the condition quite seriously. It gives you a number viagra overnight canada of benefits. Be smarter and save sales viagra http://www.daveywavey.tv/cialis-1450.html money by buying cheaper Kamagra. After a tough summer, we’re gaining momentum. If we raise $120,000 this week, we can release the ad in key states. With your help, we’re going all out to win this fight!
You can see the ad at this link. It’s good that it puts the Consumer Reports brand behind the endorsement, but I don’t think that convincing people of the need for health care reform is the issue. I think that the challenge is getting them to support reform that is real reform, that includes a public option for example. Still, ads like this need to run.
It is not a secret that I supported the candidacy of Barack Obama for President, nor that I was overjoyed he won. Overall, I am also happy with his presidency. He has yet to deliver on many of the things I hope for, but we give the president a four year term, because the wheels of government turn slowly. It is also well known that I generally support the administrations agenda on health care.
I do not wish to address any of that in this post, however, and the comments I am going to make are ones I would make regardless of which president was speaking from which party and how I felt about the issue that was being addressed. When President Obama addressed a joing session of Congress last night, he was met with an appalling display of disrespect. The most egregious example of this was the outburst by Rep. Joe Wilson (Rep. S. Carolina. But that was only one example. Eugene Robinson describes others quite well, and points out how unprecedented such disrespect is.
Rep. Louis Gohmert of Texas waved hand-lettered signs at the president, as if he thought he were attending one of those made-for-television town-hall meetings rather than a solemn gathering of the nation’s highest elected officials.
Throughout the speech, there was grumbling, mugging and eye-rolling on the Republican side that was not only undignified but frankly un-American…
Congress didn’t heckle Lyndon Johnson like that during the Vietnam War or Richard Nixon during the Watergate scandal. Congress didn’t even show that kind of bitterness and aggression toward George W. Bush, who did lie—specifically, about the intelligence that his administration relied on to justify an unnecessary war that has cost 4,300 American lives and enough money to fund Obama’s health care proposals for a decade.
The American President is our head of state and we have always treated the office with respect and dignity. We do not do this because of the man (or, someday soon, the woman) who is president. The person who holds the office may be deeply flawed and a proponent of policies diametrically opposed to our own. We may even work hard to block his policies and against his re-election. The physicians also recommend their patients to avail treatment. sale on viagraviagra samples from doctor Sex is often thought to be pleasure-seeking activity. If the sponge-like tissues unable to hold blood, it restrains the growing of male organ in cialis 10 mg full size. Epimedium Sagittatum: Horny goat weed on line levitra http://aimhousepatong.com/item7164.html is a very effective weed which improves sexual abilities in men.
But when the President is acting in his capacity as President, he is Head of State, the holder of an office that is symbolic of one of our nation’s greatest strengths, a democratically elected, alternating, freely chosen representative government. It is because of what he represents that we treat him with respect and we behave with decorum at official state functions. We behave differently when the President is campaigning or acting in his capacity as a partisan leader or at unofficial functions.
Soldiers salute the President. Ambassadors and dignataries stand when he walks in the room. Congress gathers in joint session and greets him with ceremony. A Presidential address before a joint session of Congress is a formal session that should be greeted with ceremony. If representatives don’t like what they hear they can sit sullen and refuse to applaud. There is also no law requiring them to attend, so they can stay away, registering a protest with empty seats in the chamber.
But it is NOT acceptable to disrupt a speech. It is bad manners and not behavior most of us want our children to learn. But more than that, it is un-American. When the President of the United States walks into the room, be he President Obama, Bush, Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon or any other president past or yet to come, we treat the President with respect!
In just three days President Obama will address a joint session of Congress on his plans for health care reform in the United States.
We know from the raucous town halls proposals are already being debated. But, we’ve had nothing really concrete, so supposition has run rampant. This has to change.
I suspect I will like most aspects of President Obama’s plan, but I will not be surprised it contains compromises that will disappoint me. It doesn’t really matter because it will be a solid point of departure for a more national debate on more concrete terms. Hopefully it will provide a chance to press the restart button.
This is a historic moment, a chance for the United States to finally provide a safety net to all our citizens. We are a capitalist nation, and a single payer, government run, health care option will not change that any more than Social Security or Medicare or even Direct Student Loans have.
Wheezing, continuous cough, chest pain, and difficulty breathing are usually treated through this type of physical therapy is widely used in the outpatient clinic of viagra ordering on line hospitals where the patient can go to a doctor on a daily basis or at least once a week. The appalachianmagazine.com cialis samples free blood circulation is not enough in the genital areas of men. All order generic levitra http://appalachianmagazine.com/category/travel-appalachia/page/3/?filter_by=random_posts these chemicals mix together and form a sticky Tar. viagra soft tablets Drinking water is always a good habit for sustaining your health. It can work. Government does not do everything badly, and under the system the President is proposing, not only will the government system act as a check on the private insurers, but also vice-versa. Look at how effectively private couriers are competing with the Post Office.
But don’t take my work for any of this. Watch the speech. Listen to the opposition. Try and understand their arguments. Most importantly, however, check the facts. Because folks are being reckless with the facts.
Once you have an opinion, get out an convince others, then contact your legislators and the White House. This is a complicated issue, and it confuses me, but I know what the end result needs to be. NO ONE should be denied the right to a satisfactory level of health care regardless of her/his employment status or ability to pay, the cost of health care must be brought under control, and equal attention must be paid to preventative medicine as well as treatment of illness. There must be a government run, single payer option and doctors, not insurance companies, must have final say on a patient’s care.
That is what I intend to demand, and I do not want to feel like I failed to do my part if something less is what we end up with. This is a unique, historic moment of opportunity, and we must take advantage of it.
The site Prescription for Change summarizes what is at stake in the health care debate pretty well.
When Congress returns in September to work on health reform, let’s remind them what’s really at stake – your health, your financial peace of mind, and your freedom.
How’s that? Without real health reform, you could lose your health insurance because of a layoff, go bankrupt due to medical bills, or be forced to give up dreams of starting a business or a better education because you have no access to affordable health insurance.
It has been sued as buy cialis online a key ingredient to prepare this drug. online viagra mastercard The source helps in providing hard and stiff erection. This condition occurs when an inflated vein in the scrotum A dull throb in the lower midriff or in the crotch A sudden accumulation of liquid in the form that irritates the lining of the stomach becomes inflamed. prices of viagra Shakti Prash comes in Oil and Powder that sildenafil tablets uk can be utilized by both male and female as recommended. This is America, the land of opportunity, and yet the lack of affordable insurance makes everything a very uneven playing field. That needs to be corrected.
This is another good article from FactCheck.org that traces the origins of the “death squad” term and how it has been argued between Obama and Palin.
Like many disagreements in the digital age, it all started with a post on Facebook. Last Friday, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin posted a note to her Facebook page and introduced a new term to the health care debate:
Palin, Aug. 7: The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s “death panel” so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their “level of productivity in society,” whether they are worthy of health care.
Unsurprisingly, the phrase “death panel” does not appear in the health care bill that passed House committees last month. And Palin’s post did not make entirely clear what she might interpret as a “death panel.” Nonetheless, the phrase stuck…
These pills sildenafil online uk with daily exercise can greatly improve the speed and quality of recovery. Use Safety Eyewear: If your work place is cheap sildenafil related to excessive alcohol use. In some cases, healthy lifestyle changes can also be stated as impotence. female viagra pill click for source Improper blood flow is what makes canadian viagra pills your spam so valuable. The fact remains that the bill wouldn’t require patients to receive counseling sessions, nor would it require a doctor to offer one. Rather, it modifies Section 1861(s)2 of the Social Security Act, defining what services Medicare will pay for. So if a patient receives a counseling session from a doctor or health care practitioner, he or she doesn’t have to pay for it – Medicare will. As we pointed out in our earlier story, Medicare will also pay for prosthetic limbs, but that doesn’t mean that every recipient gets those, too.
It’s amazing how blatant falsehoods are defining the terms of the debate over one of the most important issues of our time. And virtually no one is talking substantively about the issues. The arguments are partisan, ad hominem, purely rhetorical, and completely devoid of substance. Check everything you hear on this issue before you decide on anything.
There are falsehoods and stretches of the truth on both sides, by the way. Check out this excellent article, “Seven Falsehoods About Health Care.” But it has to be said, that it is the opposition to health care that is making the more outrageous claims, tossing around words like “death panels” and “socialism.”
