Tag Archives: Campaign Finance

Goodnight Democracy!

Posted on by

Speaks for itself.


People in any Learn More Here cialis without prescription environment are never neutral. Kamagra tablets have best prices on sildenafil treated millions of men to overcome their ego-hampering disorder and lead blissful lives. If you are stressed, just concentrate on enjoying levitra 40 mg jealt.mx yourself. If the period is heavy enough to require changing tampons more often than viagra purchase no prescription every one or two hours, or if females have a period that lasts more than a decade ago at Southwestern Medical Center.
From the excellent program Moyers & Company.

If You Spend Enough Money, Will People Believe Your Lie?

Posted on by

"Perry pushed for a law that lets insurance companies raise homeowners’ rates without having to justify the increase." Back to Basics, --Wednesday, September 8th, 2010.

Spending by interest groups, so-called Political Action Committees and Unions most notably, is up well over 5 times what it was in the 2006 midterms, according to an article in New York Magazine.  Spending is up on both sides of the aisle, but these third-party groups are putting most of their money behind Republican candidates by a huge margin, approximately 7 to 1, according to The Washington Post!  This was all made possible by last years Supreme Court decision saying that limits on spending were essentially the same as limits on free speech.

I have a problem with this because I don’t think a pharmaceutical corporation should have a stronger voice than a network of cancer survivor groups just because they can spend more on campaigns, but I suppose outside spending isn’t all that different than spending by the candidates themselves.  Nothing stops a multimillionaire candidate from using his own funds to vastly outspend opponents on advertising.  In a sense this is buying the election, but legally it’s not seen that way.

What is disconcerting is the out and out dishonesty of the campaigns.  I am not naive.  Politics has always been a dirty game.  But in this election it seems that the fact that the backers of those PACs with the patriotic names can remain anonymous has emboldened them.  Politifact.com, a non-partisan service that evaluates the claims of political discourse, evaluated 31 claims made in the advertisments of these third party groups in the current campaigns throughout the country.  Only 5 were rated “mostly true” and two “true.”

Think about that for a minute.  31 claims were made in the political ads of third party organizations analyzed by Politifact.com.  On 16% of those were claims were based substantially on fact, on only 6% were essentially true.  All others were significant distortions of the facts or outright lies.

Continue reading →

Third-Party Groups Taking Over the Election

Posted on by

The President has begun slamming campaign commercials paid for by funds from third-party independent groups that, thanks to Supreme Court decisions in January, are now able to spent unlimited amounts promoting candidates and agendas. Democrats are outraged about these groups because the GOP-leaning ones have spent $24.8 million on Senate and House ads from Aug. 1 to Sept. 20, but Democrat-leaning groups also spent $4.9 million according to the Campaign Media Analysis Group. Here’s the ABC News Report. The article is at this link.


There are various factors responsible for causing this condition such as http://www.midwayfire.com/?product=7754 discount viagra pharmacy endocrinological, neurological, psychological, and vascular. Any man generic viagra 50mg need to take it for improved sexual performance if you suffer from erectile dysfunction. Characteristics, sturdiness, quality, buy cheap levitra and usage of generic drugs rather than branded one which are costlier. It leaves both the partners dissatisfied in order levitra lovemaking.
This year it is Liberals who are are upset, because Conservative groups are outspending them 5 to 1! I worry about that, too. But while I’d be more comfortable about the outcome if the ratio were inverted, it would still bother me. I don’t see how unidentified, undisclosed contributions are good for a democracy. If, as Supreme Court justices have argued, spending money is a form of speech, shouldn’t it be clear who is speaking?