Here’s how one economist responded to President Obama’s idea of a spending freeze, which is likely to be a major topic of his State of the Union speech.

A spending freeze? That’s the brilliant response of the Obama team to their first serious political setback?

It’s appalling on every level.

It’s bad economics, depressing demand when the economy is still suffering from mass unemployment. Jonathan Zasloff writes that Obama seems to have decided to fire Tim Geithner and replace him with “the rotting corpse of Andrew Mellon” (Mellon was Herbert Hoover’s Treasury Secretary, who according to Hoover told him to “liquidate the workers, liquidate the farmers, purge the rottenness”.)

That economist is Princeton professor Paul Krugman, winner of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Economics.
If this is difficult for you, viagra discount be aware that many online pharmacies sell only cheap imitations. Mild effects such as headache, nausea, fatigue and nasal congestion are of normal nature. cialis generico mastercard You need to use Mast Mood oil, the effective 100mg viagra online herbal remedies to increase male desire, to eliminate sexual complications. C-Reactive Protein Inflammation within the body can lead to male impotency. pdxcommercial.com levitra 60 mg I’m not an economist, but it appears to me that that consensus is that a freeze is more or less cosmetic. It will do little to address the long term deficit issues, and is foolish under these economic conditions. Here’s what The Economist, hardly a bastion of liberalism, had to say. Continue reading →